The Clayton Christensen article, “How Will You Measure Your Life?” and the case study on Chris and Alison Weston provide a powerful conclusion to this course on Managing People and Organizations. After all the principles that we have covered, from Leadership and Erik Peterson to Change Management with Peter Browning, being inspirational leaders and effective managers comes down to our personal priorities and individual actions.
Christensen makes a powerfully moving argument to not “reserve your best business thinking for your career,” but to instead, to “create a strategy for your life.” I personally have found his final recommendation to “Think about the metric by which your life will be judged, and make a resolution to live every day so that in the end, your life will be judged a success” to be incredibly insightful.
By contrast, the case study on Chris and Alison Weston provides a cautionary tale of what can happen when we don’t follow Christensen’s advice. The Westons never expected the outcome they received, but their small unethical actions, each one justified and seemingly harmless, steadily led them to disaster.
In my personal experience, our daily decisions do determine our destiny. Consider creating a personally meaningful strategy for your life and then acting each day in a way that will bring you there.
To help you in this process, take a few minutes and review the material covered during this course. Consider the various readings, articles and case studies that you have read, and the answers that you have posted in the online discussion board and submitted for the written case study analyses. Out of all the material that we have covered, what principles stand out the most to you? Which do you think will be most important for you in your career going forward? Of all the protagonists from the case studies, which one has had the greatest impact on you? What are the most important things that you have learned?
How would you describe the schools of ethical thought
Do I Have a Core Essence?
The purpose of this discussion assignment is to reflect upon your understanding of different historical and philosophical approaches to the self. After completing your readings, write a 2–3-page paper explaining the avocado/essentialist idea of the self. Remember to explain specific theories with supporting citations from the textbook and online lectures. (Here is a guide to help you with APA-style citations.). Review and comment on the posts of other students and the instructor by the end of the week.
As you develop your response, you might find some of the following questions to be relevant:
- What is the core essence human beings are said to share?
- What are some of the differences/similarities between the avocado and artichoke views of the self?
- What is the relationship between human and divine nature?
Watch the movie,
complete 4-5 pages of thesis, including your own feelings, and discuss the contents of management courses in the movie, such as start with why, innovation, sustainability, trust, etc.
Assignment 1: Board Brief Part A – Framing the Problem/Opportunity
READ CAREFULLY AND THROUGHLY FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS.
Case 7: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.: Conscious Capitalism by Serving “Food with Integrity” (Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility)
Conduct a strategic analysis using the Executive Summary template. Prepare and submit a three-page executive summary that discusses what strategic alternatives are available and provide a recommended strategy.
You are to work alone to analyze and prepare the Executive Summary for the case. NOTE: Click “Submit Assignment” in the upper right hand corner of your screen to turn in your Executive Summary no later than Sunday, midnight CT.. Name your file with your name and the unit number, i.e. Jones1 or Brown1. Your file should be in either Microsoft word (.doc or .docx) or rich text (.rtf) format.
The following information will be required for the Executive Summary. TEXTBOOK CASE ANALYSIS GUIDANCE(CAG) and the TEXTBOOK BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TEMPLATE These files are required for the unit textbook case studies.
Synopsis of the Case: The content of the synopsis should present relevant background facts about the case under examination.
Relevant Factual Information about the Problem or Decision the Organization Faced: State the precise problem or decision the organization faced. The section should include information that addressed the business issue under examination. This section should be no longer than a single paragraph.
Explanation of Relevant Concepts, Theories and Applications Derived from Course Materials: This section should be the bulk of your paper. Analysis of the business problem or decision in light of the course concepts must be presented, as well as the business lesson another organization could learn from this situation. Besides citation to the text, learners must conduct research in the University library related to the top. Citing the textbook only is not enough to demonstrate you understand and can apply the course objectives. Here is where comparative and contrasting positions should be considered and examples and illustrations provided.
Recommendations: Provide logical recommendations to address the business lesson identified above. The recommendations need not to be specific to the organization examined, but should consider how other organizations, if similarly situated, could lessen the impact of the problem or decision identified. Recall, that the organization under examination has already moved pasted this problem so any recommendations made, at this point, are fruitless. The focus of this section should be on what other companies should be aware of to address similar problems or decisions. Citation to the textbook alone is insufficient for analysis in this section. Learners should conduct research in the University’s library to support their positions. Depth of scholarship is not demonstrated by providing personal opinions alone, but by using examples, analogies, comparison and illustrations from the academic literature. Not only does this synthesize the material to assist the reader’s understanding, it is an effective way to present the academic sources and extend the discussion of your ideas. This section should be a paragraph or two.
Alternative Recommendations: This section is not a continuation of the prior. Provide suggestions for how to avoid the problem or decision the examined organization faced. Analysis here should be may be forward- thinking, predictive or, most likely, preventative in nature but tied to the thesis statement. Again, opinion is insufficient to provide the required academic analysis. Sources, other than the text, must be provided to sustain the statements made. This section should be a paragraph, at most.
Conclusion: End the assignment with a summary of the important points made in the document. No new information may be presented. Writing a conclusion can be done by rewording the opening or reformulation the topic sentences of each paragraph to make a summary for the reader. This section should be a paragraph, at most.
- Using the Internet or Strayer databses, examine two (2) sources of outside equity capital available to entrepreneurs. Next, describe the source(s) you would use if you were creating a new company. Explain your rationale.
- Using the Internet or Strayer databses, analyze two (2) sources of debt financing. Next, discuss which non-bank source you would use if you were creating a new company. Explain your rationale.
As a junior congressperson, you have been asked to help promote a bill to allow casino gambling in your state. There is much opposition to this bill. Using distributive bargaining, discuss the pros and cons which might arise toward the passing or defeating of this bill.
1. Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences.
You are the buyer of a large quantity of ball bearings. You sign a contract drafted by the seller which states you will “pay $500,000 for shipment for agreed goods arriving to New York next year on ship MV Liberty.” Afterward you realize that “Liberty” is a common name in shipping and are concerned that a risk exists that you will be forced to pay for different goods that arrive on a ship with a similar name. Evaluate this risk and articulate ways that the contract could have been drafted to prevent a problem.
Essaysdesk.com: a professional writing service that provides original papers. Our products include academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance purposes only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references.