30D again

 30 D again

THEORIES discussion

  

EXPLORING MIDDLE RANGE THEORIES AND FRAMING PRACTICE ISSUES

week 4

Your patient is a 23-year-old female. She presents with coughing and wheezing which she stated started about three weeks ago. She is currently 25 weeks pregnant. Her last prenatal visit was one month ago in another state. She has an appointment with the prenatal care provider next week, however her respiratory symptoms brought her to your office today.

History – Chickenpox as a child. Asthma as a child, diagnosed at age 8 for which she used a SABA when needed. She has not had the need to use an inhaler since she was 19. She takes only her prenatal vitamin. No other acute or chronic problems. She advises you that she is up to date on all immunizations except she has not had a flu shot (it is October).
Social – Non-smoker, no drug use. She relocated to your state two weeks ago to get away from an abusive domestic situation. She has no support network in this area and has not yet found employment. She has no medical insurance.

HPA – Non-productive cough x 3 weeks. Wheezing audible from across the room. She states it is like this all day and wakes her from sleep every night. She reports that she is fatigued even in the morning. No other complaints.

PE/ROS – Pt appears disheveled but clean. Wheezing in all lung fields. T 98, P 82 regular, R 28 no stridor. FH 130 regular. The remainder of the exam is WNL.

02 98% and FEV 70%

Directions:

1. Construct a narrative document of 4-5 pages (not including cover page or reference page)

2. Diagnose the patient based on the above findings and provide your rationale for how you arrived at the diagnosis.

3. Develop a treatment plan specifically for this patient, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic.

4. Describe community resources (using your own community) currently available in your state/city to support this patient.

5. Provide a communication plan that you will use to ensure the patient is an active participant in the treatment plan. Refer to therapeutic communication concepts.

6. Utilize national standards, your pharm and/or patho book, and medical or advanced practice professional sources. Do not use patient-facing sources or general nursing texts.

7. Use references to support your concepts. Utilize correct APA formatting (7th edition) and mechanics of professional communication.

Before finalizing your work, you should:

·
Read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);

·
Consult the Grading Rubric (under Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary.

Your writing assignment should:

· Follow the conventions of 
Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, mechanics, etc.);

· Be 
well organized, logical, and 
unified, as well as 
original and insightful;

· Utilize correct APA formatting, 7th edition.

· Submit to, and review results of Turnitin. Purdue University Global Student Conduct policy as it relates to plagiarism will be adhered to in this course.

Rubric Title: MN553 Unit 4 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Level III

Level II

Level I

Not Present

Criteria 1

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Diagnosing the patient

· An accurate diagnosis with correct staging is provided

· Rationale for arrival at the diagnosis with support from national guidelines is provided

· An accurate diagnosis is provided with staging that may not be correct

· Rationale for the diagnosis is provided without support

· An accurate diagnosis is provided with staging that may not be correct

· Rationale for the diagnosis is provided without support

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 2

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

Providing pharmacologic intervention

· Correct medications are prescribed to treat the diagnosis

· Rational for medications prescribed adheres to national guidelines

·

· 50% of correct medications are prescribed

· Rational to support prescribed medications is provided and adheres to national guidelines

· Less than 50% of the correct medications are prescribed

· Rational to support the prescribed medications is not present or does not adhere to national guidelines

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 3

Level III Max Points

Points: 5

Level II Max Points

Points:

Level I Max Points

Points:

Not Present

0 Points

Providing non-pharmacologic interventions

· Five or more non-pharmacologic interventions are provided

· Three or four non-pharmacologic interventions are noted

One or two non-pharmacologic interventions

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 4

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 7

Level I Max Points

Points: 0

Not Present

0 Points

Writing a communication plan

· A communication plan which includes principles of therapeutic communication is developed

· A communication plan that does not include principles of therapeutic communication is developed

· Does not meet the criteria

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 5

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 7

Level I Max Points

Points: 4

Not Present

0 Points

Community Resources

· Three or more local community resources are provided

· Two local community resources are provided

· One local community resource is provided or:

· Resources are provided but they are not local to the community

· Does not meet the criteria

Criteria 6

Level III Max Points

Points: 10

Level II Max Points

Points: 8

Level I Max Points

Points: 6

Not Present

0 Points

College-level academic writing

· Professional, peer-reviewed, advanced practice references are used

· Grammar and mechanics of writing demonstrate graduate level work

· Adheres to page number requirements

· The majority of references used are professional, peer-reviewed and advanced practice

· Errors in grammar or mechanics of writing are present but do not interfere with readability

· Adheres to page number requirements

· The majority of references used are professional, peer-reviewed and advanced practice

· Errors in grammar or mechanics of writing are present but do not interfere with readability

· Does not adhere to page number requirements

· Does not meet the criteria

Maximum Total Points

55

44

33

0

Minimum Total Points

45 points minimum

34 points minimum

1 point minimum

0

pm2 m2 writeen

summit the complete question

Case Study 3

 Pagana: Mosby’s Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, 6th Edition Adolescent With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) Case Studies The patient, a 16-year-old high-school football player, was brought to the emergency room in a coma. His mother said that during the past month he had lost 12 pounds and experienced excessive thirst associated with voluminous urination that often required voiding several times during the night. There was a strong family history of diabetes mellitus (DM). The results of physical examination were essentially negative except for sinus tachycardia and Kussmaul respirations. Studies Results Serum glucose test (on admission), p. 227 1100 mg/dL (normal: 60–120 mg/dL) Arterial blood gases (ABGs) test (on admission), p. 98 pH 7.23 (normal: 7.35–7.45) PCO2 30 mm Hg (normal: 35–45 mm Hg) HCO2 12 mEq/L (normal: 22–26 mEq/L) Serum osmolality test, p. 339 440 mOsm/kg (normal: 275–300 mOsm/kg) Serum glucose test, p. 227 250 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 2-hour postprandial glucose test (2-hour PPG), p. 230 500 mg/dL (normal: <140 mg/dL) Glucose tolerance test (GTT), p. 234 Fasting blood glucose 150 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 30 minutes 300 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL) 1 hour 325 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL) 2 hours 390 mg/dL (normal: <140 mg/dL) 3 hours 300 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) 4 hours 260 mg/dL (normal: 70–115 mg/dL) Glycosylated hemoglobin, p. 238 9% (normal: <7%) Diabetes mellitus autoantibody panel, p. 186 insulin autoantibody Positive titer >1/80 islet cell antibody Positive titer >1/120 glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody Positive titer >1/60 Microalbumin, p. 872 <20 mg/L Diagnostic Analysis The patient’s symptoms and diagnostic studies were classic for hyperglycemic ketoacidosis associated with DM. The glycosylated hemoglobin showed that he had been hyperglycemic over the last several months. The results of his arterial blood gases (ABGs) test on admission indicated metabolic acidosis with some respiratory compensation. He was treated in the Case Studies Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2 emergency room with IV regular insulin and IV fluids; however, before he received any insulin levels, insulin antibodies were obtained and were positive, indicating a degree of insulin resistance. His microalbumin was normal, indicating no evidence of diabetic renal disease, often a late complication of diabetes. During the first 72 hours of hospitalization, the patient was monitored with frequent serum glucose determinations. Insulin was administered according to the results of these studies. His condition was eventually stabilized on 40 units of Humulin N insulin daily. He was converted to an insulin pump and did very well with that. Comprehensive patient instruction regarding selfblood glucose monitoring, insulin administration, diet, exercise, foot care, and recognition of the signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia was given. Critical Thinking Questions 1. Why was this patient in metabolic acidosis? 2. Do you think the patient will eventually be switched to an oral hypoglycemic agent? 3. How would you anticipate this life changing diagnosis is going to affect your patient according to his age and sex? 4. The parents of your patient seem to be confused and not knowing what to do with this diagnoses. What would you recommend to them? 

Discussion

 

  1. What was your biggest “take away” from any/all of the simulations?
  2. What did you find most challenging from the simulations? 
  3. How is what you learned from the assignments applicable to the medical field?
  4. Give examples of how such knowledge can affect your direct patient care. 

Health promotion w2 peers responses

Home Health week 2 peer response

respond to peers thoughtfully, add value to the discussion, and apply ideas, insights, or concepts from scholarly sources, such as: journal articles, assigned readings, textbook material, lectures, course materials, or authoritative websites. For specific details and criteria, refer to the discussion rubric in the Menu (⋮) or in the Course Overview Weekly Discussion Guidelines. 

1st peer response

McKenzie Ledbetter

The Health Belief Model (HBM) was developed by Hochbaum, Rosenstock, and Kegels, psychologists working in the US Public Health Services. HBM is based on perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers. This Model can be used to predict health behaviors, for example, the intention to vaccinate or comply with medical interventions. I chose this model because it is important to know if your patients will engage with healthy behavior or not. If it is the latter, you can implement education and resources to help them make healthy choices.

During the COVID pandemic, misinformation had an enormous impact on people following precaution guidelines. Many people ignored recommendations due to their lack of accurate information. The HBM can raise awareness of the relationship between health, information, and the digital landscapes the public interacts with (Houlden et al., 2021).

I believe this model can address my topics because there are a lot of people who have been misinformed about healthy behaviors regarding mental health and childbirth. This model can help screen for those individuals and once identified, education and resources can be offered to encourage better heath decisions.

 

Houlden, S., Hodson, J., Veletsianos, G., Reid, D., & Thompson-Wagner, C. (2021). The health belief model: How public health can address the misinformation crisis beyond COVID-19. 
Public health in practice (Oxford, England)
2, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100151

2nd peer response

Megan Brown

· I chose the Transtheoretical/Stages of Change Model. This model helps describe a patient's motivation and readiness to change a health-related behavior they may want to improve. It is described in a five-step process and evaluates the patient's behavioral change, the process of the changes, decision-making, and self-efficacy. Here are the five stages of this model: 

      1. Precontemplation: the patient is unaware of their need to change and most likely is unwilling to change. 

      2. Contemplation: this is when the patient begins to develop a desire to change and get better. 

      3. Preparation: personal plans begin of how to change. 

      4. Action: when the patient incorporates the new behavior into their life and/or routine. 

      5. Maintenance: the patient is consistent in changing and demonstrating that change, usually for six months or more. 

· I chose this model because I feel it gives the patient ways to improve and get better in a clear and precise way. It gives the patient their own choice to get better, which I feel is an excellent way to get a patient to change unhealthy behaviors. The patient needs to have that desire to change and get better first. It demonstrates more of an understanding of the actual cognitive and behavioral changes the patient will experience and go through. “Movement through these stages does not always occur in a linear manner, but may also be cyclical as many individuals must make several attempts at behavior change before their goals are realized” (Marcus & Simkin, 1994). It gives the patient time to work through each stage, even if it may not happen the first time, but it helps them feel more fulfilled. 

· This model can be used to address the Healthy People topic and objective I have chosen because, a lot of the time, the patient is unaware they need to change or unwilling to change. They don't know what steps they need to take to get better. Once given the education on how to get better, they need to desire to get better. This model can show the patient that they are getting better and gives them something to look at. It can also show healthcare professionals how the patient is improving and where they are at. 

 

Reference: 

Marcus , B. H., & Simkin, L. R. (1994, November 26). 
The transtheoretical model: Applications to exercise behavior. National Library of Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7837962

Unit 8 Medications for Sleep Disorders —2 Peer Response 600w. due 10-25-23

Unit 8 Medications for Sleep Disorders —2 Peer Response 600w. due 10-25-23

Please read and respond to at least two of your peers' initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers:

• Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.

• How are they similar or how are they different?

• What information can you add that would help support the responses of your peers?

• Ask your peers a question for clarification about their post.

• What most interests you about their responses?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Ingrid A.

· There are multiple sleep disorders such as insomnia, sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, hypersomnia, circadian rhythm disorders, and parasomnia which I think is “sleepwalking” or at least very similar to sleepwalking (Sleep Disorders, 2020).

Screening tools to diagnose sleep disorders can be just as gathering information from the patient, like history and physical. There are other screening tools such as actigraphy which is something like a watch the patient must wear and this tracks the movements the patient makes when sleeping and being awake (How is actigraphy used to evaluate sleep?, 2022)

Adding more we also have polysomnography also known as the “sleep study”, and this particular test records brain waves, oxygen level as well as heart rate (Polysomnography (Sleep Study) 2023). Epic (electronic health record) has something called the stop-bang questionnaire and it basically asks questions about snoring, blood pressure, and the size of the neck. There is also something called the Athens Insomnia Scale and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Sleep disorders: Clinical tools, 2023).

Z-drugs such as zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon are innovative hypnotics that aid with sleep, reduce sleep latency, and improve quality. These drugs are prescription dispensed only and they work by slowing the activity in the brain (Commissioner, 2023).

Benzodiazepines are medications such as lorazepam, diazepam, temazepam, alprazolam, and clonazepam among others that can have potential side effects such as respiratory depression, drowsiness, impaired judgment, nausea and vomiting, confusion, addiction, and even respiratory distress (Brandt & Leong, 2017).

References:

Brandt, J., & Leong, C. (2017). Benzodiazepines – statpearls – NCBI bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470159/

Commissioner, O. of the. (2023). Taking z-drugs for insomnia? know the risks. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/taking-z-drugs-insomnia-know-risks

How is actigraphy used to evaluate sleep?. Sleep Foundation. (2022, May 10). https://www.sleepfoundation.org/sleep-studies/actigraphy

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (2023, February 17). Polysomnography (Sleep Study). Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/polysomnography/about/pac-20394877#:~:text=Polysomnography%2C%20known%20as%20a%20sleep,measures%20eye%20and%20leg%20movements.

Sleep disorders: Clinical tools. CAMH. (2023). https://www.camh.ca/en/professionals/treating-conditions-and-disorders/sleep-disorders/sleep-disorders—clinical-tools

U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2020, January 3). Sleep disorders. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/sleepdisorders.html


Mojgan A

Week 8, Medications for Sleep Disorders

What screening tools can be used to affirm your initial diagnosis that a patient may meet the diagnostic criteria for a sleep disorder?

        There are different tools for assessing sleep disorders. Among various rating scales, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was specifically designed to evaluate overall sleep quality and is among the recommended questionnaires for examining global sleep patterns and symptoms related to insomnia (Zitser et al., 2022). It is a self-report questioner and will assess the sleep quality over one month. Another useful scale is the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), which is a questionnaire designed to assess daytime sleepiness. A higher score on the ESS suggests the need for further evaluation for possible sleep disorders (Clinical application of headache impact test (HIT)-6 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 2023).

        According to the literature, the gold standard for monitoring sleep and breathing is polysomnography (PSG). PSG observes various physiological factors during sleep, including brain activity, eye movement, heart rate, and muscle activity. It involves the use of special bands around the chest and abdomen, as well as sensors for temperature and airflow in the nose. PSG also utilizes a device to measure airflow and sensors for air pressure in the airway. However, it's important to note that these methods can be invasive and time-consuming to set up and understand (Naik et al., 2023). Home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) is a simplified version of PSG that can be conducted at home and offers several potential benefits compared to traditional PSG, such as increased accessibility, quicker treatment initiation, and cost savings (Johns et al., 2022).

Describe the pharmacological actions of non-z sleep medications?

       Non-benzodiazepine (non-Z) sleep medications, such as zolpidem (Ambien), eszopiclone (Lunesta), and zaleplon (Sonata), function by enhancing the activity of the neurotransmitter known as gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the central nervous system. GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter that promotes relaxation and facilitates sleep. One key distinction between benzodiazepine medications and non-Z medications is their selectivity in targeting GABA receptors (Stahl, 2021).

       Benzodiazepines act on various GABA receptor subunits (including alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3 and alpha 5 receptors) nonselectively. Benzodiazepines acting on alpha2 and alpha3 receptor subtypes have effects that reduce anxiety, promote muscle relaxation, and enhance the effects of alcohol. On the other hand, the alpha5 subtype, found in the hippocampus, may be implicated in cognitive processes. As a result, benzodiazepines are employed for the treatment of sleep disorders, seizure disorders, and anxiety disorders due to their broader spectrum of activity (Stahl, 2021).

        In contrast, non-Z medications selectively target alpha 1 receptors, which are primarily associated with the sleep process. Therefore, non-Z medications are specifically designed to induce and improve sleep without affecting the full spectrum of GABA receptors. Another distinction to note is that benzodiazepines typically have longer half-lives, which means they remain in the body for a more extended period compared to non-Z medications. This difference in half-life can have implications for factors such as prolong sedation and potential for dependence or withdrawal when using these medications. Non- Z medications are usually used for short amount of time and do not cause dependence or withdrawal symptoms (Stahl, 2021).

What problems can occur when benzodiazepines are used to help with sleep?

        Benzodiazepines are potent medications known for their effectiveness, but they come with a range of significant concerns and potential problems. They have sedative properties, leading to drowsiness and increased sleepiness in patients. Additionally, benzodiazepines exhibit a prolonged half-life, resulting in an extended duration of action within the body, which can impact a patient's overall quality of life. These medications have been associated with several adverse effects (Stahl, 2021).

        Benzodiazepines can impair cognitive function, memory, and coordination, potentially leading to accidents and reduced overall performance. A major concern with benzodiazepines is the development of tolerance. Over time, patients may require higher doses to achieve the same therapeutic effect. This can lead to physical and psychological dependence, as patients become addicted to the sedative properties of the medication (Stahl, 2021).

        Abruptly discontinuing benzodiazepines can result in unpleasant withdrawal symptoms, which can be challenging for patients. One study by Ritvo et al. (2023) revealed that over 40% of the respondents reported experiencing 17 or more symptoms persisting for at least one year after discontinuing their use of benzodiazepines. Common side effects associated with benzodiazepines include dizziness, drowsiness, and coordination problems, which can be especially problematic for individuals who need to remain alert and functional. It's essential to be mindful of potential drug interactions, as benzodiazepines can interact with other medications, potentially affecting their effectiveness or causing unexpected side effects (Stahl, 2021)

        Given these concerns, it is advisable to use benzodiazepines cautiously and only for short durations. When discontinuing their use, a slow tapering approach is often recommended to minimize the risk of withdrawal symptoms. This ensures that the benefits of these medications are balanced against the potential risks and adverse effects they may cause.

References

Clinical application of headache impact test (HIT)-6 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) for sleep apnea headache. (2023). 
Sleep Science and Practice, 7, 1-9. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41606-023-00084-2Links to an external site.

Johns, J. D., Armin, M., Alexandra, W., Jeffrey, K. H., Mikula, S. K., & Hoa, M. (2022). Reliability of home sleep apnea testing for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea in patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. 
Cureus, 14(10)

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29854

Naik, G. R., Breen, P. P., Jayarathna, T., Tong, B. K., Eckert, D. J., & Gargiulo, G. D. (2023). Morphic sensors for respiratory parameters estimation: Validation against overnight polysomnography.
 Biosensors, 13(7), 703. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070703Links to an external site.

Ritvo, A. D., Foster, D. E., Huff, C., Reid Finlayson, ,A.J., Silvernail, B., & Martin, P. R. (2023). Long-term consequences of benzodiazepine-induced neurological dysfunction: A survey.
 PLoS One, 18(6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285584

Stahl, S. M. (2021). 
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical application (5th ed.).

Zitser, J., Allen, I. E., Falgàs, N., Le, M. M., Neylan, T. C., Kramer, J. H., & Walsh, C. M. (2022). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) responses are modulated by total sleep time and wake after sleep onset in healthy older adults.
 PLoS one, 17 (6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270095

 Reply

Discussion/Conclusion

 

The discussion section is a place to highlight the successes and the challenges that may be experienced through the process of implementing the proposed intervention and the results of the anticipated and unanticipated outcomes. Should end with clear and data-driven conclusions and implications. You should highlight the lessons learned, including next steps for future investigations and challenges to the proposed intervention. Include implications of policy, education, practice, research and/or management as applicable.

Cite any sources in APA format.