Nursing Assignment

Week 2 Ethical Health Promotion Paper

Find a scholarly, peer-reviewed article no more than four years old that discusses an ethical health promotion-related issue.

In your paper:

· Briefly summarize the presented issue.

· Describe your thoughts on the role health care professionals should play in resolving the ethical issue.

· Provide specific theories and refer to specific ethical codes to support your position.

Your paper should be 2–3 pages long. Use APA to cite and reference the article and any other optional sources you use. Adhere to APA formatting throughout your paper.

Rubric

NURS_561_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric

NURS_561_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >31.6 pts

Meets Expectations

The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment.

31.6 to >23.6 pts

Approaches Expectations

The response to the assignment is generally adequate but may not be thorough.

23.6 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The writer does not respond to the assignment.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail

30 to >23.7 pts

Meets Expectations

There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.

23.7 to >17.7 pts

Approaches Expectations

There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.

17.7 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The topic and main ideas are not clear.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20 to >15.8 pts

Meets Expectations

The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.

15.8 to >11.8 pts

Approaches Expectations

The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.

11.8 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA

10 to >7.9 pts

Meets Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

7.9 to >5.9 pts

Approaches Expectations

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

5.9 to >0 pts

Not Meeting Expectations

The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Psychopathology

Thinking about what you’ve learned in this course about 

1-    If you had the power to change anything in this class that is assessment related, what would you change and why?

2-    How will the concepts you learned in this class help you in your career? 

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner. 

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%

week 2 Community Café discussion

Here’s a question I have for you this week. Compare and contrast the TAPS Health Assessment Tool and the CAPS Health Assessment Tool. Try creating a side-by-side chart so that at a quick glance you can identify the similarities and the differences. The differences are key as this is how to tell them apart.

SOAP note

 

For all the SOAP note assignments, you will write a SOAP note about one of your patients and use the following acronym:

S =Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC).O =Objective data: Including client behavior, physical assessment, vital signs, and meds.A =Assessment: Diagnosis of the patient’s condition. Include differential diagnosis.P =Plan: Treatment, diagnostic testing, and follow up

Nursing ASSIGNMENT

Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions.

BY DAY 6 O

& Mastrian, K. G. (2022). 
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)

· Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)

· Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: 

The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site.

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
49(11), 543-548.

· Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). 

Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.
: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. 
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing
36(5), 209-213.

· Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: 

Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

w5 yi

Taking into account internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate mid-range theories or their use in research. critique Self-Efficacy theory using the internal and external critique evaluation process.

discussion post

Explore the factors contributing to the development and recurrence of UTIs, such as urinary stasis, urinary catheterization, and antibiotic resistance. How can nurse practitioners assess and address these risk factors in patient care to prevent UTIs and minimize recurrence?

Discussion #2 5400

The purpose of learning the ropes of policy, politics and advocacy is to influence health care or broader social agendas that influence human health.  Discuss a time where you influence health care through advocacy.

The discussion must address the topic. The post must be 400 words long and include 2 scholarly references.

discusion 2

 

Modern psychopharmacology is largely the story of chemical neurotransmission. One must be fluent in the language and principles of chemical neurotransmission to:

  • Understand the actions of drugs on the brain.
  • Grasp the impact of diseases upon the central nervous system.
  • Interpret the behavioral consequences of psychiatric medicines.

After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:

  • Choose an FDA-approved medication currently used in psychiatry.
  • Explain the concept of that drug’s half-life.  
  • How long would it take for that drug to reach a steady state?  
  • How frequently should the medication be dosed based on the half-life? 
  • Use Epocrates.com as a reference for this assignment.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.
  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 
  • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
  • Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
  • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Research Table (Healthcare)

Due 10/4   5 pm EST

Please Follow instructions. attach article