Annotated Bibliography (Healthcare) 250 WORDS

DUE 9/25   12 PM EST

250 words not including title and reference  APA

TOPIC: Health Equity 

  

The literature review is key to any research study or article development. It is important to review the literature within your own discipline, but also other disciplines which may confront similar issues or have related concerns. For example, practice issues in other health related fields often correspond to those confronted in nursing. Nursing education concerns may also be found in academic research within other disciplines outside of the health care field.

  • What is the purpose of conducting an organized literature review?
  • How will you approach this aspect of your research?
  • What literature other than nursing literature do you feel may offer useful information?
  • How might you incorporate these ideas into your proposal?
  • Provide an example of a piece of literature that supports your topic and provide a brief summary of the article.

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

 All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format. 

nutrition

• Create nutrition power point

• Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

• Met length and slide requirements. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors. APA in-

text citations and references are used correctly. Resources have outstanding credibility.

• Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

• Met length and slide requirements. Few spelling and grammar errors. APA in-text

citations and references are used with few errors. Resources have sufficient credibility.

• Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

• For each of the nutrients selected, created content slide(s) that thoroughly addressed all

3 of the required items (3a through 3c). Content is consistently accurate, presented in a

logical fashion, and is extremely easy to follow.

• Proficiency: Clear/effective achievement

• For each of the nutrients selected, created content slide(s) that sufficiently addressed

the 3 required items (3a through 3c). Content is mostly accurate, is well organized, and

is easy to follow.

• Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

• For each of the nutrients selected, created content slide(s) that begin to address the 3

required items (3a through 3c). Content is partially accurate, shows the early stages of

organization.

• Mastery: Advanced or exceeds achievement

• All 5 items selected were appropriate nutrients from within the categories listed.

• Emerging: Limited or growing achievement

• Fewer than 3 of 5 items selected were appropriate nutrients from within the categories

lis

• Advanced or exceeds achievement

• All 5 items selected were appropriate nutrients from within the categories listed.

• Competence: Adequate/basic achievement

• Partially met length and slide requirements. Some spelling and grammar errors, which

detract from the audience's ability to comprehend material. Attempted to use APA in-

text citations and references. Resources have reasonable credibility.

Article Review

Article Review on two nursing articles, I already picked them. In APA format, provide a summary/paraphrase of both articles and a review/evaluation and opinion on both articles. Provides minimum of 150-250 words with word count noted following annotated bib notation for each of the provided
articles.

Fluids and Electrolytes

PowerPoint presentation

Theme: Fluids and Electrolytes, Acids and Bases

12-15 slides

Role and Engagement of Stakeholders

Please see the attachment for the instructions

Discussion 3

 Respond at least 2 times each. The goal is for the discussion forum to function as robust clinical conferences on the patients.  

see below

see below 

CRITICAL CARE WK 2

MY NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 2 WHICH IS: Oropharyngeal airways

Initial post:

Each student will be assigned a number randomly.  Whatever your number is, select the corresponding topic below, then post a minimum of 5 bullet points about the topic.

Your bullet points should address key components of the topic, such as what, how, who, & why.  This information should not be basic things you learned in Med/Surg, but rather advanced critical care based. 

Think about this as a group effort to create a study guide. Use ONLY your textbook, but do not cut & paste from the book.

Then create, find, or borrow a test style question about your topic & post at the bottom of your bullet points. The format needs to be multiple choice or select all that apply. Think NCLEX style.

 Each week include a paragraph with the results from one of your weekly interviews.

Discussion post assignments are worth 20 points each as follows: 

  • 5 points for the quality of your bullet points.
  • 5 points for the quality of your question.
  • 5 points for answering the question of a peer as your response.
  • 5 points for the quality of your rationale.
    • Quality is defined as thorough and thoughtful while demonstrating professional level knowledge of the topic.

Informatics in healthcare

Assistance with an upcoming assessment

help

Critique a Aanp organization

Write a 2 page critique of this meeting using APA format for any cited resources and create a document that describes: 

  1. The Organization
  2. Mission, goals, and focus
  3. Membership