Repply to 2 classmated posts

 Reply to at least two classmates’ posts. Your response to your  classmate’s discussion should be around 50 words (each) and add to the  discussion (i.e. reflecting on their response, asking questions, etc.). 

repply to Jennifer and to a Juvenal

Nursing powerpoint assignment

For this assessment, you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

Collapse All

Introduction

As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter.

You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Demonstration of Proficiency

  • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
    • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.

Professional Context

This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

Scenario

In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA.

When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.

Instructions

Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
  • Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
  • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
  • Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
  • Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

  • Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
    • What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
    • Why should the audience care about solving it?
  • Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
    • Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
    • How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
  • Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
    • What is the objective?
    • How likely is it to work?
    • What will the interdisciplinary team do?
  • Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
    • How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
    • How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
    • How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
  • Part 5: Evaluation.
    • What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
    • What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
      • How could this be used to show the degree of success?

Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.

Additional Requirements

  • Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
    • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
  • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    • Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
  • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
    • Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
    • Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided.
    • Organize content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors.

Nursing

Make 1st posting by Thursday. Make 2 responses to peer postings by Sunday.

Discussion 3:

1. Describe one health care policy related to health care access and tell how it relates. How does the policy address health equities and disparities?

2. Explain which segment(s) of the Public Health Nursing Wheel relates to the effects of economics/health care access and health care policy you just described. That is, tell which outer segment(s) and which segment(s): Systems-focused, Community-focused, Individual-focused, Population-Based/Case Finding, or Population-Based. (Your response may be one or more segment(s).)

The Public Health Intervention Wheel is found at The Minnesota Department of Health at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/opi/cd/phn/wheel.html

3. Visit Healthy People 2030 Priorities at https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas List the three priority areas for Healthy People 2030. Read about social determinants on the same Healthy People 2030 website. Describe two social determinants of health that directly relate to the three priority areas for Healthy People 2030.

Include at least two citations and references in your initial discussion posting (WHO website is okay to use for this discussion). Use APA format. Respond to a minimum of two other classmates regarding their post. Your responses to peers should be substantial. Substantial postings are more than just saying “I agree.” Substantial postings add to the point made, provide more information, ask a probing question, or share an experience. End your initial posting with a question to your classmates that furthers discussion on the topic. Also, see the discussion grading rubric. Please write or paste your posting in the discussion box instead of attaching it in a document. Thanks!

Synthesis and Application #3 initial posting due on 10/5/23 by 11:59 pm and two replies to peers due by 10/8/23 by 11:59 pm

CONCEPT MAP (altered level of consciousness)

please see the attached files for details and instructions. 

discussion

 

  1. After studying the lesson “Nursing Leadership” in Chapter 21 of the textbook (eBook), open a discussion forum by answering the following questions:
  2. What is leadership?
  3. What is a leader?
  4. How does a nurse demonstrate leadership characteristics? Explain.
  5. Do you think Florence Nightingale was a leader in the nursing profession? Why?          Explain.
  6. Describe the following types of leadership: autocratic, democratic, and Laissez-Faire. Give an example of each one within the nursing field.
  7. This topic will be part of class discussion this week (Module 7).
  8. In addition to the eBook, you are required to use at least two more primary references.
  9. Remember APA style when use references “in-text” citation and in the References at the final of your publication.
  10. Submission Instructions:
  • Submit your discussion post by 5:59 PM Eastern on Thursday, October 5th, 2023. 
  • Your initial post should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
  • Respond to your classmates’ discussion posts by 11:59 PM Eastern on Saturday, October 7th, 2023. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.

nursing

Introduction to Public Health Virtual Simulation

Complete Introduction to Public Health at https://phtc-online.org/learning/?courseId=15

In this interactive online module, students will learn about introductory concepts in public health. Click on Enroll. You will go to a Login Screen ….at bottom click on create an account now. Create an account. Click on Training Module at the top of the page. Select Orientation to Public Health. Click on Enroll. Read the information and click on Begin Orientation to Public Health. Click on Please check your inbox – A.T. to begin. Complete the training, take a screenshot of the certificate, or scan the certificate and upload it to the course drop box. The online module takes about 45-60 minutes to complete. At the end, students will obtain a screenshot of the Summary screen and upload the screenshot to the assignment drop box for grade credit. In addition, students will write a paragraph in APA format and include one evidence-based journal reference (within the last 5-7 years supporting the definition and synthesis of public health nursing practice. You must submit the word document paragraph summary to the respective assignment dropbox.

reply

Option 1: 

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and the Fourteenth Amendment both aim to address issues of equality, but they focus on separate concepts. The ERA, first proposed in 1923, is explicitly targeted at gender-based discrimination, seeking to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex “The Equal Rights Amendment would put protection for women and other marginalized genders directly into the United States Constitution.” (MacKinnon & Crenshaw, 2019).  In contrast, the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, is a broader constitutional provision that encompasses various civil rights issues, including the Equal Protection Clause, which ensures equal protection under the law without specifying gender “The U.S. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled for decades that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects women from unequal treatment under the law.” (Herrod et al., 2021). While both amendments share the goal of promoting equality, the ERA is specifically concerned with gender equality, whereas the Fourteenth Amendment has a broader scope, addressing a range of civil rights issues such as race, gender, and other forms of discrimination. 

References: 

Do We Still Need the Equal Rights Amendment in 2022? (2022, March 24). BillTrack50. Retrieved October 14, 2023, from

https://www.billtrack50.com/blog/dividedwefall_era/

Herrod, C., Fischer, S., & Forde, K. (2021, July 5).
Do We Need the Equal Rights Amendment Today? — Divided We Fall. Divided We Fall. Retrieved October 14, 2023, from

https://dividedwefall.org/equality-amendment/

MacKinnon, C. A., & Crenshaw, K. W. (2019, December 26).
Forum: Reconstituting the Future: An Equality Amendment. The Yale Law Journal. Retrieved October 14, 2023, from

https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/reconstituting-the-future-the-equality-amendment

project-week6 -information system

**Please note, you are to remove all red wording and replace with your own content. Use short bullet points in all boxes. Boxes will expand as you type. Please delete this box prior to submission.

Insert photo, graphic or chart to increase visual appeal

Provide all references for all sources utilized in APA format, though a hanging indent is not needed.

References

Identify the developed and reliable mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the app, including the following: name, purpose, intended audience, mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, where to download or obtain it, and any other applicable information. Be sure to cite all sources you use in APA format. The mHealth app source is a required citation.

mHealth Application

Describe how you would determine the success of the patient's use of this app. For example, include ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good fit for the type of mHealth app and focus on specific ways that this app benefits the patient's health and wellness. Include the 3 evaluation strategies you used in Milestone 2.

Evaluation

This section should contain important points about the mHealth app that you want to teach to the patient. Include the 3 areas from Milestone 2.

Information about the mHealth app

Safety guidelines

How to interpret and act on the information that is provided

Teaching

This section should include the approved patient scenario that includes a disease process, diagnosis, a desire to maintain good health and prevent illness. Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.

Scenario

Name

Course

Session

Insert Title Here

1

image1.png

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 3: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF RESEARCH

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). 
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

· Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–228)

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. 


American Journal of Nursing

Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

· Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II. 


American Journal of Nursing

Links to an external site.
, 110(7), 47-52

· Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence.

American Journal of NursingLinks to an external site.
, 110(11), 43-51. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

· Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. 

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationLinks to an external site.
, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733

·

Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document)

see below

see below