Lymphatic, Chest, & Heart

 

This Discussion has 3 parts:

  1. Lymphatic
    • Define lymphedema.
    • What is elephantiasis?
    • Provide the differential diagnosis of mumps versus cervical adenitis.
  2. Thorax and Lungs
    • Define and provide an example of a disease/situation where this sign/symptom might be present:
      • Dyspnea
      • Orthopnea
      • Apnea
      • Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
      • Tachypnea
      • Bradypnea
      • Hyperpnea
      • Kussmaul breathing
      • Periodic breathing (Cheyne-Stokes).
    • Support your answer with a previous experience you have encountered in your career.
  3. Cardiovascular System
    • Name and write the location of the five traditionally designated auscultatory areas and explain why it is heard there.
    • A pregnant patient (32 weeks’ gestation) is having difficulty with dependent edema and painful varicosities. What can you suggest to help this patient’s problem and explain rationale?

Response

 

 Due 10/13/23 @ 1600 EST

Respond by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively. 

using APA, at least 2 scholarly references 

 

The results show that the organization encourages collaborative decision-making, where multiple stakeholders, including employees, have a say in important matters. This can lead to a more inclusive and democratic decision-making process. Members are actively involved in creating and shaping workplace policies. This involvement ensures that policies reflect the needs and preferences of those who work within the organization. The organization recognizes the importance of periodically reviewing its policies to remain relevant and practical. This proactive approach helps in identifying areas that may need improvement or adjustment. The organization is also open to revising policies as necessary. This flexibility allows for adaptation to changing circumstances or feedback from members.

Members of the organization share a vision and mission based on trust, respect, and collegiality. Communication at all levels of the organization is transparent, direct, and respectful. The organizational culture is assessed on an ongoing basis, and measures are taken to improve it based on the results of that assessment.

surprisingly “Most employees did not recommend the organization as a good or great place to work to their family and friends.” This suggests that despite some positive aspects mentioned in the assessment, many employees are dissatisfied to the point where they would not recommend the organization to others. This could indicate a significant issue with the workplace culture or conditions that may need urgent attention.

Another surprising thing is that “Individual and collective achievements are not celebrated and publicized equitably.” This lack of recognition and celebration of achievements can harm employee morale and motivation. It is surprising because recognizing and celebrating accomplishments is common in many organizations to boost employee engagement and satisfaction.

Before the assessment, I had an idea that “Communication at all levels of the organization is transparent, direct, and respectful.” the assessment confirms this aspect as it indicates that the organization values open and respectful communication and is seen as a positive sign, as effective communication is crucial for building trust and a healthy workplace culture (Dempsey & Assi, 2018).

It is evident from the findings that my workplace is civil because it values employees, fosters a positive and inclusive culture, invests in employee development, and prioritizes their well-being. Such an environment will likely attract and retain talented individuals and contribute to the organization’s long-term success.

The assessment also shows that my workplace is characterized by trust, respect, engagement, and a positive culture providing a healthy working environment. However, it is essential to continue monitoring and addressing any potential areas for improvement to sustain this healthy and civil work environment.

The concepts presented in the articles appear to be related to organizational culture and employee satisfaction. A healthy organizational culture that aligns with employees’ values and supports their well-being is more likely to result in higher employee satisfaction. When employees feel that they fit into the culture, are respected, and have opportunities for growth and development, their satisfaction increases. The assessment evaluates various aspects of an organization’s work environment, including trust, communication, employee engagement, leadership, and more (Cummings et al., 2018). These factors collectively contribute to the organizational culture and can significantly impact employee satisfaction and overall well-being.

In summary, the theory of organizational culture and employee satisfaction closely aligns with the assessment criteria in my workplace. A positive organizational culture, characterized by trust, communication, recognition, and employee well-being, will likely result in higher employee satisfaction, engagement, and morale (Cummings et al., 2018). Conversely, a negative culture can lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of employee recommendations. 

To apply the theory of organizational culture and employee satisfaction to improve organizational health and create stronger work teams, an organization can take several specific actions and initiatives:

Define and Communicate Clear Values and Mission by holding regular meetings or workshops to reinforce the organization’s mission and values. Ensure that all employees understand and can articulate these core principles.

Foster Trust and Open Communication by Implementing regular “town hall” meetings where leadership provides updates and encourages questions from all employees. Create anonymous feedback channels for employees to express concerns or suggestions.

Recognize and Celebrate Achievements through establishing an employee recognition program that acknowledges outstanding contributions and achievements. Celebrate milestones and successes as a team.

Employee engagement and morale through Conducting regular employee engagement surveys to gather feedback on job satisfaction and areas for improvement. Act on the survey results by implementing changes based on employee input.

The organization seems to prioritize a positive and inclusive culture where trust, respect, and collegiality are fundamental principles. This is a commendable approach that can contribute to a healthy work environment. Committing to transparent and respectful communication at all levels is crucial for maintaining trust and ensuring all employees feel heard and valued. Open and honest communication is key to a thriving organization. Recognizing employees as valuable partners rather than liabilities is essential as it fosters a sense of belonging and motivates employees to contribute to the organization (Atrizka et al., 2020). Encouraging shared governance, teamwork, and collaboration reflects a commitment to involving employees in decision-making processes, which can lead to better solutions and more significant employee investment in the organization’s success. Notably, most employees did not recommend the organization as a good or excellent place to work to their family and friends. This indicates a potential area for improvement and suggests that the organization should actively address any concerns or issues that employees may have.

In summary, the organization seems to have many positive elements for creating a healthy and supportive work environment. However, it should pay attention to the feedback provided by its employees to address any areas that need improvement and enhance overall employee satisfaction and advocacy.

                                                                                                              References

Atrizka, D., Lubis, H., Simanjuntak, C. W., & Pratama, I. (2020). Ensuring Better Affective Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior through Talent Management and Psychological Contract Fulfillment: An Empirical Study of Indonesia Pharmaceutical Sector. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy11(1).

Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International journal of nursing studies85, 19-60.

Dempsey, C., & Assi, M. J. (2018). The impact of nurse engagement on quality, safety, and the experience of care: what nurse leaders should know. Nursing administration quarterly42(3), 278-283.

DOCTOR OF NURSING PRACTICE

  

1. As a Doctor of Nursing Practice Student, describe how the Doctor of Nursing Practice Essentials have impacted your practice.

2. Describe how Doctor of Nursing Practice Essentials will serve as your roadmap for the future.

3. Analyze each Essential followed by your story as it relates to that particular essential.

4. As it relates to your own story, share your biblical viewpoint.

Document this assignment in 4 page word document, include a minimum of 5 articles 

wk5

Week 5: The Theoretical/Conceptual Framework

The theoretical framework is a critical element of your work. A theoretical framework is

the general representation of relationships in your problem and is based on existing

theory. The conceptual framework is your idea on how the problem should be

explored, and it is generally based on a theory. The difference between the two is the

scope. Theory is broad; concept is narrow.

In most research studies, your framework can be either theoretical or conceptual in

nature. For the purposes of this project, you will most likely follow a conceptual

framework, which is your idea on how the research problem will be explored (although

you could have both).

For example:

• Theoretical framework: Stimulus is applied to elicit a response

• Conceptual framework: A new teaching method is applied to elicit improvement

in midterm test scores.

In this section of your change project paper, state the perspective through which the

problem and/or phenomenon may be explored, and include the following:

1. Select a minimum of two theories.

2. Identify the process and logic in selecting these theoretical frameworks or

conceptual frameworks for your study.

3. Discuss how each theory or model applies to the individual project.

4. Present the framework guiding your study.

• Describe the assumptions of the framework.

• Describe each key component of the framework.

5. Discuss how each element of the phenomenon applies to the framework.

• Apply each element of the theory to the elements of the phenomenon under

study.

• Develop the rationale for the sample selection criteria.

6. Discuss, analyze, and critique pertinent research that uses the framework.

Remember that research never proves theory. Your research project can only support

or refute the theoretical propositions you are using as your framework. But if you do not

use theory or conceptual frameworks in your research, you may not be able to put your

findings in a context that could strengthen the nursing education profession!

This section should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference page.
You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly articles.

Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on

how the assignment will be graded.

NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 5: Theoretical Framework

NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 5: Theoretical Framework

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Content 60 to >49.2 pts

Meets Expectations

Identifies independent theories or conceptual

models that relate to the change project topic and

describes how they will be applied to the change

project. Thoroughly discusses how each element of

the phenomenon applies to the framework. Clearly

applies each element of the theory to the

elements of the phenomenon under study.

Develops the rationale for the sample selection

criteria, and expertly discusses, analyzes, and

critiques pertinent research that uses the

framework.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Organization

7.5 to >6.15 pts
Meets Expectations

Content is well written throughout. Information is

well organized and clearly communicated.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome APA
Format/Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts
Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format,

length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is

free of spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 pts

Total Points: 75

  • Week 5: The Theoretical/Conceptual Framework

USING POLICY CHANGE AS A TOOL TO ADDRESS INEQUITIES

HOW BEST TO USE POLICY TO PROMOTE OPPORTUNITIES

Plagiarism at the Master's Level

 

Write About the Consequences of Plagiarism at the Master’s Level

Plagiarism is a serious academic offense, especially at the master’s level, write a short reflection (approximately 300 words) on the consequences of plagiarism in higher education, specifically at the master’s level. Discuss why academic integrity is crucial, potential consequences for students who engage in plagiarism, and how to avoid it. Be sure to cite any sources you use properly.

Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease

 Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed.  

at this point week 4 D

please follow all directions

Oncologic emergencies

 

Instructions

Read the article, “Oncologic emergencies in a cancer center emergency department and in general emergency departments countywide and nationwide”.  You may access the article in the resource folder. 

Thoroughly review the complete research article exploring the management of oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients visiting the Emergency Department (ED). Focus on patient characteristics, diagnoses, and factors influencing hospitalization.

Your case study should demonstrate a thorough grasp of the entire article, using specific details to support your points. This assignment aims to assess your ability to distill complex medical information into a focused case study, highlighting essential strategies for managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients. 

Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

Case Study Focus:

Based on your comprehensive reading, create a Case study highlighting key strategies for effectively managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.

Key Points

Resource Optimization: Explain how increased resource utilization and hospitalization rates among cancer patients impact healthcare delivery. Discuss strategies to optimize resources while maintaining high quality care.

Timely Diagnosis: Emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and intervention. Provide examples from the article illustrating the benefits of early recognition and swift treatment.

Tailored Interventions: Explore the concept of tailoring treatments to individual oncologic conditions. Share insights on customizing interventions based on diagnoses outlined in the article.

Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Discuss the value of multidisciplinary collaboration in managing critically ill patients. Describe how different specialties can work together for comprehensive patient care.

Risk Stratification: Explain the role of risk assessment in identifying high-risk patients and the significance of early interventions to prevent complications.

Education and Training: Address the impact of education and training on enhancing oncologic emergencies management. Highlight the benefits of well informed healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Summarize key insights from the article and emphasize the patient centered approach to managing oncologic emergencies in critically ill patients.