Compare and contrast the growth and developmental patterns of two toddlers of different ages using Gordon’s functional health patterns. Describe and apply the components of Gordon’s functional health patterns as it applies to toddlers.
Word limit 500 words
Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.
NURSING CAREER
APA FORMAT
THEY CHECK FOR PLAGERISM/AI
SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN ATTACHMENT
Please discuss the importance of USPSTF Screening Recommendations in Primary Care.
Please include 400 words in your initial post and 200 words in your answers to your peers. The initial post is due Wednesday at midnight and the answers to your peers Saturday at 23:59pm.
Mr. Smith brings his 4-year-old son to your primary care office. He states the boy has been ill for three days. Mr. Smith indicates that he would like antibiotics so he can send his son back to pre-school the next day.
History – Child began with sneezing, mild cough, and low grade fever of 100 degrees three days ago. All immunizations UTD. Father reports that the child has had only two incidents of URI and no other illnesses.
Social – non-smoking household. Child attends preschool four mornings a week and is insured through his father’s employment. No other siblings in the household.
PE/ROS -T 99, R 20, P 100. Alert, cooperative, in good spirits, well-hydrated. Mildly erythemic throat, no exudate, tonsils +2. Both ears mild pink tympanic membrane with good movement. Lungs clear bilaterally. All other systems WNL.
Do not consider COVID-19 for this patient diagnosis.
For the assignment, do the following:
1. Diagnose the child and describe how you arrived at the diagnosis (i.e. how you ruled out other diagnoses).
2. Provide a specific treatment plan for this patient, pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic.
3. Provide a communication plan for how the family will be involved in the treatment plan.
4. Provide resources that Mr. Smith could access which would provide information concerning your treatment decisions.
5. Utilize national standards, your pharm and/or patho book and medical or advanced practice professional sources. Do not use patient-facing sources or general nursing texts to support your diagnosis and treatment.
6. Use references to support your concepts. Utilize correct APA formatting and mechanics of professional communication.
Present this Assignment as a narrative document, with a minimum of 4, and maximum of 5 pages not counting the cover page or reference page. It is not necessary to repeat the facts of the case in your narrative.
Before finalizing your work, you should:
·
Read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
·
Consult the Grading Rubric (under Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
· Utilize
spelling and
grammar check to minimize errors.
Your writing assignment should:
· Follow the conventions of
Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, mechanics, etc.);
· Be
well organized, logical, and
unified, as well as
original and insightful;
· Utilize correct APA formatting, 7th edition.
· Submit to, and review results of Turnitin.
|
Unit 6 Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Making a correct diagnosis |
· An accurate diagnosis is provided · Rationale for arrival at the diagnosis with support from literature |
· An accurate diagnosis is provided · Rationale for the diagnosis is provided without support from literature |
· An accurate diagnosis is provided · Rationale for the diagnosis is not provided |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points Points: 12 |
Level II Max Points Points: 9.6 |
Level I Max Points Points: 7.2 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Developing a treatment plan |
· A correct and specific pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment plan for the case study patient is provided |
· A specific treatment plan is provided for the case study patient but is missing less than 50% of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment. |
· A specific treatment plan is provided for the case study patient but is missing more than 50% of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment. |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points Points: 8 |
Level II Max Points Points: 6.4 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.8 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Providing the patient or family with resources |
· Three or more patient resources to assist with understanding the treatment plan are provided |
· Two patient resources to assist with understanding the treatment plan are provided |
· One patient resource to assist with understanding the treatment plan is provided |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points Points: 7 |
Level II Max Points Points: 5.6 |
Level I Max Points Points: 4.2 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Developing a communication plan |
· A communication plan which includes principles of therapeutic communication is included |
· A communication plan that does not include principles of therapeutic communication is provided |
· Does not meet the criteria |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5 |
Level III Max Points Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
· Professional, peer-reviewed, advanced practice references are used · Grammar and mechanics of writing demonstrate graduate level work · Adheres to page number requirements |
· The majority of references used are professional, peer-reviewed and advanced practice · Errors in grammar or mechanics of writing are present but do not interfere with readability · Adhere to page number requirements |
· The minority of references used are professional, peer-reviewed and advanced practice · Errors in grammar or mechanics of writing are present Which interferes with readability · Does not adhere to page number requirements |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 6 |
Level III Max Points Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Citations and Formatting |
· Includes a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. · Minor paper formatting errors may occur. · Minor in-text citation errors may occur. · All authorship is clear and retrievable. |
· Includes an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. · Errors in formatting of citation or sources are present. · All sources have some form of citation and all citations have a matching source. · Citations generally make authorship clear. |
· Major errors in citations or source formatting are present. · Citation or source information may be missing or incorrect. · Authorship may be unclear. |
· Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
55 |
44 |
33 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
45 points minimum |
34 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
1. Give an example of how you have advocated for a patient, peer or subordinate and the outcome. How did acting as an advocate help you grow as a leader? (application).
2. Describe an example of strategic or operational planning you have seen in your place of work and appraise the outcome (pros and/or cons) of this planning (evaluation).
3. Analyze the type of organizational structure at your place of work, (which structure does it most closely resemble and why?) How does the structure influence mission, vision, philosophy, and values (evaluation)
4. Which power-building strategies (organizational, political and or personal) have you found to be the most effective for enhancing your personal power and why? Which has been the least effective or hardest to achieve and why?
After reading Chapter 14 respond to the following prompts;
What questions should the nurse ask about collective bargaining and labor relations?
What does signing a card mean, and what questions should Addison ask before signing?
How can Addison establish good relationships with both nurse managers and staff nurses in an atmosphere in which collective bargaining has put these two groups in adversarial positions?
What skills and information will Addison need to navigate and make effective decisions in this hospital?
What provisions in a union contract are in a patient’s best interest as well as a nurse’s?
What resources are available to Addison to help her learn more about labor and management issues occurring in the hospital?
I HAVE ATTACHED CHAPTER 14 TO BE READ AND USED TO ANSWER THE ABOVE QUESTIONS
Which study design is the most powerful for generating evidence?
According to Tracy, O’Grady, and Phillips (2023), when taking all study designs into consideration, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) remains the gold standard research design for generating evidence. RCT remains the gold standard because it is based on three critical elements which includes manipulation of an experimental intervention; comparison of the group receiving the experimental intervention versus the group receiving the placebo; and randomized assignment to the experimental or control groups. Randomized assignment to the aforementioned groups helps to prevent bias from being introduced into the study and increases validity (Tracy et al., 2023).
References
Tracy, M. F., O’Grady, E. T., & Phillips, S. J. (2023). Hamric & Hanson’s Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach (7th ed.). https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9780323777131
Healthcare reform is a constantly discussed topic in the U.S. healthcare system. Various influences, including political, societal, and real-time events (think COVID-19) all help to shape the discussion surrounding reform as it relates to the U.S. healthcare system. This link contains a tracker of all pending or introduced reform legislation currently.
Among the biggest talking points relating to the healthcare reform discussion over the past decade has been the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and whether it should remain as it is, be improved upon, or be dismantled and a new system put in its place. Review the most current attempt at modifications to the ACA in this link.
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.
Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES
New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technological trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.
In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
· Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
· Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.
· For information about annotated bibliographies, visit
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.
The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:
· Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
· Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
· In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.
· Use APA format and include a title page.
· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
LEARNING RESOURCES
· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).
Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
· Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)
· Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)
· Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)
· Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)
· Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)
· Benda, N. C., Veinot, T. C., Sieck, C. J., & Ancker, J. S. (2020).
Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!Links to an external site.
.
American Journal of Public Health,
110(8), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784
· Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017).
Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study
Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study
.
Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
· HealthIT.gov. (2018c).
What is an electronic health record (EHR)
?Links to an external site.
Retrieved from
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
· Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018).
Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagementLinks to an external site.
.
Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.
· Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021).
Digital inclusion as a social determinant of healthLinks to an external site.
.
NPJ Digital Medicine,
4(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
· Skiba, D. (2017).
Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applicationsLinks to an external site.
.
Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.
· Sharma, P., & Patten, C. A. (2022).
A need for digitally inclusive health care service in the United States: Recommendations for clinicians and health care systemsLinks to an external site.
.
Permanente Journal,
26(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.156
Essaysdesk.com: a professional writing service that provides original papers. Our products include academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance purposes only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references.