Soap Note 1 “ADULT”  Wellness check up (10 points) 

 

There are subtle—but distinct—differences between communicating with an individual and a group. Communication among group members can be seen as a microcosm of communication within the entire organization. Using the company that you selected in Week 1, complete the following analysis to show the differences between writing and communicating a message:

• Select 2 communication channels to present 1 message to (a) an individual employee within the organization and (b) a group within the organization.
• Describe a new product being released by your company by writing messages of 400–500 words to (a) the individual, and (b) the group.
  • For the individual employee message, consider how the new product affects the individual’s job or role within the organization. How would you customize the message?
  • What considerations are important in the message for a larger group? Are there specific differences? Answer these questions in the analysis.
  • Lastly, explain what communication channels are most effective when dealing with individual employees, a group, and the larger organization. Consider cross-communication platforms, too. How do they complement each other?

Provide 1–2 sources other than your textbook to support your answer. Use APA style for citations.

  Due today 09/28/23 2000 EST

Respond by making recommendations for how they might strengthen the leadership behaviors profiled in their StrengthsFinder assessment, or by commenting on lessons to be learned from the results that can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors.

2 scholarly references

The strength finder assessment I took is an eye opener to my strengths and weaknesses. It also showed me where to exert some effort and how to do it. The findings followed this order.

1. Achieving Person: Achiever means someone who is always looking to do better. This theme helps me understand what my drive is. I am always looking to get things done better and more manageable. 

2. Consistency: I care about balance. It is essential to treat everyone the same, no matter their situation, not wanting the scales to tip too far in favor of one person because that sends wrong signals to the team.  

 3. Gathering Information: I think critically and make out opinions of things and people. I might be trying to solve a problem, develop an idea, or understand how someone else feels. 

 4. Harmony/ Teamwork: I want people to have a common ground for achieving goals. There is little to gain from disagreement and chaos. When I know that the people around me have different ideas, finding common ground always breaks the ice and ensures we achieve common goals.

5. Relator/Relationship: The Relator theme makes me want to be with people I already know. Meeting new people might be challenging, but it is worth trying to achieve a common goal.

      The two central values that I would strengthen are optimism and creativity. There are times when I need more confidence concerning some situations. As for creativity, I do have various concepts that I can implement. Nurses are known for their emotional intelligence and critical thinking, which might affect their effectiveness. These attributes may affect clinical decision-making, reasoning, evidence-based practice, and practice-based knowledge in nursing. (Kaya et al. 2018) 

     The two strengths that I would make sturdier is self-confidence because, many times, self-doubt places a trick on me, especially when I am not sure about an issue. I will also work on building relationships because making new associates has advantages. 

       Two qualities must be improved upon: patience with my associates when handling issues. And delegating. Being a perfectionist makes me want to do everything myself to get the desired outcome. I need to harmonize these findings to achieve the best out of my strengths and weaknesses. 

                                                                                     Reference 

Kaya, H., Şenyuva, E., & Bodur, G. (2018). The relationship between critical thinking and emotional intelligence in nursing students: A longitudinal study. Nurse Education Today, 68(68), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.024

Rath, T. (2007). Strengthsfinder 2.0. Gallup Press.

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. (pp. 182–211)

‌

 The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic Resources in your response. 

NUR640 Week 4 Assignment 4.1 Page 1

`

Assignment Title: Research Critique

Step 4 for your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project (Research Proposal)

Assignment Overview:

Since your EBP Research Proposal does not include completing the entire research process, e.g., collecting data, statistics, or findings, you will do a critique of a Level of Evidence I-IV research article there is a rubric related to this critique that you will follow.

Deliverables:

The final copy of your Research Critique assignment is due on or before Sunday at 11:59pm, just before Week 5 begins, at the latest. Be sure to use the file naming protocol: NUR640_EBP Step4_last name_mmddyyyy.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will write a research critique of a research article. It does not have to be an article similar to what you would do in a Research Proposal. It can be a research article that you find scholarly and would like to delve into more deeply. The critique does need to be a LeveI I-Level IV level of evidence. Use the discernment gained from your Week 4 Discussion regarding whether your article is credible, and use that to answer a section in your research critique.

Include the Following Sections that are noted on your research critique, and use your textbook if you are unsure of what each of these headings mean.

1. Purpose

2. Conceptual Framework

3. Design/Method

4. Sampling/Setting

5. Major variables studied and their definition

6. Data Analysis

7. Study Findings

8. Overall strengths and weaknesses of the study, e.g. reliability and validity, ethics (IRB), topic, etc.

Grading: Each part (category) listed above for your research article critique has a rubric that is to be followed. All submissions should have a title page and reference page.

image1.png

image2.jpeg